Home CRICKET Aus vs Ind 2024-25: Australia to monitor Marsh as starters back after...

Aus vs Ind 2024-25: Australia to monitor Marsh as starters back after thrashing

0


Coach and selector Andrew McDonald has confirmed Australia’s squad will remain unchanged for the second Test in Adelaide, but there are some concerns over Mitchell Marsh’s fitness following a humiliating defeat to India in Perth.

The same 13-man squad that was selected for the first Test, which included reserve batsman Josh Inglis and reserve fast bowler Scott Boland, will be the group on duty in Adelaide, although McDonald did not go so far as to commit to the same XI. He also confirmed that the entire team would gather in Adelaide on Monday, a day earlier than originally planned, for an extra net session following the 295-run drubbing they received in Perth.

“The same people in that dressing room are the same people who will be in Adelaide,” McDonald said after one of Australia’s worst home performances in recent memory.

Asked if Marsh had recovered well after bowling 17 overs in three days, the most he had achieved in a game in three years after bowling just four overs in all of cricket over the past eight months, McDonald was cautious. “We’ll wait and see,” he said.

The coach did not think Australia had fallen short of bowling options in Perth, due to Marsh’s fitness, despite taking just 16 wickets on a surface where India managed to take 20 easily while restricting Australia to just 104 and 238. .

“No, we don’t feel that [was a weakness]”McDonald said. “We knew that Mitch [Marsh] “It was a little bit below par, but I thought the performance in the first innings was satisfactory.”

The coach was further pressed about whether the same XI would appear in Adelaide and whether Inglis could be considered to replace a specialist batsman.

“We’ll evaluate it as we go, but like I said, the team that’s there will be in Adelaide,” he said.

External pressure increases on the out of form Marnus Labuschagne. McDonald acknowledged there will be plenty of conversations with Labuschagne about his batting over the next 11 days, but they were confident he was the best No 3 option if he can rediscover his form.

“That’s an ongoing discussion and it has ups and downs in players’ careers, so right now he’s in one of those moments and will certainly be criticized externally,” McDonald said. “But internally we are very confident that, at his best, he is the player we need.”

One problem Australia faces is the quality of options below the starters in domestic cricket. The selectors faced a difficult decision in selecting Nathan McSweeney to make his Test debut, opting to promote the 25-year-old to open the batting despite having never done so in Sheffield Shield cricket and having had the majority of his first-class success and Nos. 4 and 5.

Inglis’ success in first-class cricket came batting at number 6 as a wicketkeeper, and he has no record of top-four success for Western Australia. Beau Webster is another who has been prolific in Shield cricket of late, but only at No. 6. He would only come into the equation if Marsh was ruled out and a fifth bowling option was necessary.

The selectors’ lack of faith in Marcus Harris, Cameron Bancroft and Matt Renshaw has been evident in the last 12 months, when none of them have been selected despite a vacancy becoming available twice in that time.

Beyond that, there aren’t many batsmen in Shield cricket who are posting huge numbers to justify Test selection, partly due to the difficulty of domestic pitches. But McDonald was confident the talent would be there if needed.

“I think there have been enough players knocking on the door,” he said. “I feel like we have some depth if we need to. I think sometimes people look at the pure numbers of what happens in Shield cricket, but sometimes it’s hard to make a connection with the surfaces they sometimes play on. So “We feel like we have a lot of players available if needed.”

McDonald added that a review of Perth’s performance would focus on whether Australia’s failures with both bat and ball were due to poor planning or poor execution.

“It’s always a combination,” McDonald said. “We felt like our planning was where we needed it to be. Execution in the midst of that is always an issue. We were comfortable with the plans. Clearly, the approach with the hitters and the way they’ve been challenged always goes well. “It’s going to be a learning in the future. “So we have some challenges, there’s no doubt about that.”

Alex Malcolm is associate editor of ESPNcricinfo



Source link

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version