The cricket Scotland (CS) racing row is threatening to erupt again after the Board was accused of being elusive and collecting the best results to deal with the consequences of research on accusations of racism and racist behavior.
Instead, they made 245 recommendations, or learning, with which cricket Scotland has committed, and is in the implementation process.
But now it has emerged that the two legal signatures had compiled reports based on their joint investigations that, according to final racism, include “contradictory views among members of the research team.” The reports focus on the period in which HAQ was sent home from the 2015 World Cup to tweet “always more difficult when in a #Race #Colour” minority after being abandoned for a game. He never played another game for Scotland, despite being his main Wickt-Tomador
According to Haq’s lawyer, Aamer Anwar, a report makes it clear that Haq “was discriminated against and victim of raising complaints, and that victimization continues today.” The report finds prima facie evidence that the decision to send it home, as well as several results as a result of that decision, had elements of racial bias and discrimination. It is believed that the other report has a different opinion.
The reports were intended only for internal consumption within the Board and had not been shared in their entirety with HAQ, despite the applications. Racism in racism said they had received a complete copy for an “anonymous source” and said it was clear why cricket Scotland had been “so difficult to achieve by providing more details.”
“While we accept that the reports themselves were prepared for cricket Scotland, they were prepared independently, and cricket Scotland has chosen to summarize the aspects that they wish to share and leave aside the conclusions they do not like. These conclusions expose their lack of action when they face clear evidence of problems.”
Haq said the Board had tried to hide the conclusion of the report. “[It] Validate what I already knew: that I have been racially discriminated and that I am still a victim as a result of speaking. And yet, cricket Scotland has tried to hide that of me and harm me with statements such as ‘we could have better managed his World Cup departure’.
“The cricket Scotland has hidden behind the jurisdiction once more. While I feel relieved to finally read my report and see the truth, I think everything should be revealed and let the public decide who is guilty in all this. It is clear that a lot of information has been swept under the carpet.”
cricket Scotland has emphasized that the report was an opinion and one of the multiple. They expressed their disappointment for the violation of confidentiality when leaving the Board.
“We understand that a small number of people continues to be publicly for the results of the process,” said the Board in a statement. “Suggesting this means that cricket Scotland is not taking an anti -racist posture is simply incorrect.
“It is deeply disappointing that a research process that would be based on the confidence of the people involved and a confidential report that followed is used for more personal agendas.
“The report is an opinion that was built around this matter, and not a fact of fact. Other opinions and a detailed legal analysis were provided so that the cricket Scotland Board considers how it would act.”
Osman Samiuddin is a senior editor in Espncricinfo
