McNulty: First things first, you’ll want a sunlit view, giving the team the identity it’s never had under Erik ten Hag. He will want to be determined to work on the entire setup intact, working together with her week uniting his personal ideas with those above him.
He will need to have a wealth of things to deal with the original pressures and scrutiny of managing Manchester United and no longer be haunted by the shadows of the date, even if the severe shortage of good fortune will make his task a little easier. .
Murray: We’ve seen the qualities when Tottenham played them recently. A fearless coach like Ange Postecoglou, who will attack and play fearless football matches.
There were different concerns surrounding becoming Manchester United manager. It must offer not only strength in tone but also international expectation. The defeat to the latest generation of Spurs gave an insight into what United fans want to see from their team.
suton: And without any hint of uncertainty, he will want to come in and put his own stamp on the team, and produce his own players, but, until that happens, he will have to make do with the players already at United.
The most important and notable thing for whoever gets the process will be to develop an identity, but do you have the players to immediately play however you want?
I look at their midfield and aging players like Casemiro and Christian Eriksen, and they don’t seem ready to press the way some coaches would like them to.
Now it’s a matter of anyone coming in and slowly building because as far as I see they don’t have the players to do anything else.
To begin with, however, the intact supervisor wants to temporarily organize the team and get his message across.
Schmeichel: It is definitely the most difficult playing field on the planet to play soccer. To be the boss you must be mentally sound. The pressure on Manchester United players and executives is relentless. Everything you do is under the microscope.
We have tried voluminous managers, voluminous names and it hasn’t worked. I don’t care that we appoint the next one who is just a coach, takes care of the team, has participation but appears in the response. It’s the modern way of doing this, so why not believe it?
I feel that it is a fascinating process: the participation of the workforce is not serious. There is simply no structure to lean towards. Are we urgent? Are we preserving the ball? For anyone who spends all year training, I think this is a good suggestion.
